Software Engineering Design Project Presentation Evaluation Form

Presentation Being Evaluated:

Evaluator's Name:

Please evaluate the group's presentation according to the following
criteria.  Note that some items relate to an individual presenter,
while others relate to the group's presentation as a whole.  Please
edit a copy of this file for each group and submit them through
Submission Box.  Both complements and constructive criticism are
welcome and encouraged.  Your anonymized feedback will be shared with
your classmates.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Preparation

Please comment on the group's preparation for the presentation.  Some
points to address could include

- the effectiveness of the prepared presentation guides (e.g., slides,
  web pages)

- organization of the presentation -- was it organized in a logical
  and interesting sequence that was easy for the audience to follow,
  including appropriate introductory and concluding sections?

- formatting, spelling, or grammatical errors in the slides

- presentation length

- group participation in the presentation and question/answer session

Please give your thoughts on this group's preparation below:



----------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Presentation

Please comment on the presentation style, including comments for each
participant.  You might include comments on

- ability to hold the audience's attention through effective eye
  contact and to avoid reading from notes or slides

- body language (e.g., did he or she use appropriate movements and
  gestures to enhance the audience's ability to understand)

- poise, confidence, recovery from mistakes, enthusiasm

- volume, articulation, pace

Please give your thoughts on this group's presentation skills below:



----------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Content

Please comment on the presentation's content.  You might comment on
whether or not the presentation clearly covered the following:

- the purpose of and background information about the project

- team structure, design decisions, implementation details, documentation

- retrospective discussion of the design and implementation process,
  including what went well and what should have been done differently

- client delivery results and/or plans

- features requested that remained in the "waiting room"

Please give your thoughts on this group's presentation content below:



----------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Project

Please comment on the actual project implementation, rather than its
presentation.  Some items to comment on would include:

- whether you believe the project successfully met its objectives

- whether "bug bash" issues were addressed

- how well it appears that the team worked together and fairly
distributed the workload

Please give your thoughts on this group's project implementation below:



----------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Comments

Please provide any additional feedback you wish to share about the
project or its presentation.